3月29日托福考试回顾：考题内容

3月考试终于结束了，接下去要迎来托福考试的淡季。上周六的考试，一个学术写作新题，其余两题都是来自于去年考察过的旧题。托福综合写作和口语独立都考到了比较早的题目，难度就不会太高了。

Writing

第一套

综合写作

主题：鲱鱼（menhaden）资源锐减危机的解决方案

阅读部分：

1. 控制条纹鲈种群以缓解捕食压力。

2. 维持现有饲料供应链稳定。

3. 规避捕捞限制带来的经济风险。

听力部分：

1. 生态链具有不可割裂性，人为干预顶级掠食者将导致系统性生态紊乱。

2. 大豆蛋白替代方案具有经济可行性，其成本优势与可持续性远超传统饲料模式。

3. 短期产业阵痛将换取资源再生周期，避免渔业系统彻底崩溃带来的永久性经济损失。

学术讨论

传统纸媒与社交媒体

Today we are going to talk about different sources for acquiring news. In today's discussion, I would like to hear your opinions on which form of news resources is better? Social media or traditional media?

Andrew

Social media is the future because it is convenient and more up to date.

Claire

A lot of people still prefer to rely on television or newspapers because the content from traditional media is more well-produced.

因学点评

本场考试的学术写作去年9月21日考过的一个题目，考察获取信息来源究竟是传统媒体还是社交媒体。整体难度不高。支持社交媒体的，我们可以从速度以及自由度来讨论，支持传统纸媒的，我们可以从专业性以及真实性角度考虑。下面我们来看一下因学老师限时完成的两方的范文：

支持Claire：

I agree with Claire. First, it's wrong for Andrew to only boast about the merits of social media in interaction. In fact, due to the lack of professionalism and training, streamers or influencers can't offer valuable insights but some personal or radical comments. If you are looking for some objective and reliable content, then surely the user-generated content, like the posts on YouTube, is your last choice. Furthermore, social media doesn't boost your efficiency of obtaining information. Actually, it's highly likely that you have to struggle in the sea of such chaos of information for a long time before you realize that you can gain nothing meaningful but personal feelings and guesstimations, and in some extreme situations, bias and fraud. Still, the traditional media, such as newspapers with their well-trained staff, could guarantee the truthfulness of their news sources. Compared with social media, traditional media channels are still a much safer choice.

支持Andrew：

I prefer social media forms to traditional media. First, the user-generated content could be totally free of back-stage manipulation and corruption as such content is unpredictable. When there are no prepared scenarios or role plays, the content on the spot is certainly more reliable, or at least genuine. Compared with social media, the traditional media is often criticized for their deliberate bias and discrimination. For example, you can hardly imagine that the BBC will report positively about China's foreign polices in East Asia and Europe. Second, social media ushers in a variety of different voices, which makes it possible for users to avoid being swayed by the so-called mainstream media. In fact, overdosed exposure to just one source of media will only lead to brainwash or indifference while a wide range of choices brings more sophisticated and rational insights. Therefore, I believe social media forms prevail over traditional media.

第二套

综合写作
主题：prescribed burning是否值得实施

 阅读部分：

1. 对相关区域的野生动物造成威胁，尤其是筑巢动物。

2. 燃烧所释放的烟雾会污染空气。

3. 人工起火烧过的地方仍然有山火发生。

听力部分：

1.选好时机，找野生动物不生育后代的时期，成熟的动物的话可以通过控制火速让它们轻松避开。

2.森林是吸收二氧化碳的，所以让火小一点就可以保证没有空气污染。

3. 人工起火能把易燃危险物烧完，因此虽然山火仍会发生，但严重程度会降低。

学术讨论
购物参考渠道讨论

Let's continue talking about consumer behavior. We have been discussing different ways people go about choosing what products to buy, and there are many potential sources of information and advice for consumers. In your opinion, which is the better strategy for making purchasing decisions relying on advice from friends and family, or depending on information from online sources? Why?

Claire

An internet search would be much more efficient.

Paul

My friends could have advised me better because they know my preferences and the kind of features that I am interested in. Consumers should get advice from the people around them to find the most suitable products.

因学点评

同意Claire：

1. For one thing, the online information is more diverse and therefore more trustworthy. 线上信息更加多样化。

2. For another, online information performs far better in protecting one’s privacy and secrets. 保护隐私，如果送人礼物会更加有惊喜。

同意Paul：

1. Although the best strategy for making purchasing decisions depends on the individual's preferences and needs, I tend to follow the recommendations of friends and family members. The main reason is that purchase advice from loved ones can carry a higher level of credibility.  可性度高。

2. More importantly, if my friends and family members have purchased the product before, their recommendations can be based on first-hand experiences, which surely makes my purchasing decision much wiser and more practical. 家人朋友有一手经验，可以给到更加实际的建议。

第三套

综合写作
主题：Several factors to destroy Roman towns

阅读部分：

1. Wild birds damage works of art contained within the towns' structures. 鸟类会破坏古城中艺术作品。

2. A second problem is damage caused by human tourists. 游客也会造成破坏。

3. The buildings of Pompeii and Herculaneum have experienced structural failures. 原先古城建筑就经历了结构的问题。

听力部分：

1. People can train hawks and introduce them to the Pompeii and Herculaneum cities and then pigeons would be afraid of them and fly away. 训练老鹰来吓走鸽子。

2. There is an affordable way, which means history enthusiasts could be hired to do much volunteer work. 招募历史爱好者来做保护。

3. Today’s engineering work can replace low-quality cement support with safer cement support containing new chemical composition. 用新的化学物质代替原先低质量的材料。

学术讨论

是否需要取消短途航班？

We've been discussing environmental policies, and one issue that has gained attention is whether short-haul flights should be banned. Many countries have good train systems that can replace short flights. What do you think? Should short flights be banned when there are other options like trains? Why or why not?

Claire

Short-haul flights should be banned if trains are a good alternative. Train stations are in city centers, so they are often more convenient and better for the environment.

Paul

Banning short-haul flights isn't the best solution. These flights help manage air traffic by connecting passengers to bigger airports.

因学点评

同意Claire：应该鼓励其他短途交通方式

I agree with Kelly that it is reasonable to ban short-haul flights. On the environmental front, banning short-haul flights could indeed reduce carbon emissions. Air travel is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and short-haul flights, which are often less efficient than long-haul flights, can have a higher carbon footprint per passenger mile. If trains can provide a comparable service with a lower environmental impact, then from an ecological standpoint, the case for banning these flights is strong. As for Paul's concerns about short-haul flights connecting passengers to larger airports, this function of flights could also be replaced by alternative greener transportation means such as interurban railways or regional buses, which prove to be effective in many major cities such as New York City, London, and Shanghai.

同意Paul：一刀切的禁止不是好主意

On the environmental front, banning short-haul flights could indeed reduce carbon emissions; however, I agree with Paul on that a complete ban on short-haul flights might not be the most practical or effective solution. For one thing, many regions may lack the railway infrastructure to support all short trips. The effectiveness of train systems as a replacement for flights depends on their capacity, frequency, and coverage. In many areas, train services may not be as frequent or convenient as air travel, which could discourage travelers from switching to trains. Moreover, while trains can be a more environmentally friendly option, they may not always be the cheaper alternative. This could also deter airline customers from making the switch. In light of these considerations, a more balanced approach which involves providing incentives for travelers to choose trains and encouraging the development of more fuel-efficient aircraft will be more reasonable than simply banning short-haul flights. 

2.Speaking

第一套

Task 1

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is disrespectful for tourists to take photos of strangers without their permission.

Use details and examples to support your opinion.

因学点评

这道题是关于日常生活当中的一个具体场景，注意要把题目规定的每个细节都考虑进去。

范文：

Personally, I think it's absolutely disrespectful to photograph strangers without asking. Here's why: First, privacy matters, and photographing someone without consent violates their right to control their own image. Imagine someone snapping a photo of us in a vulnerable moment—like when we're upset or working—and posting it online without consent. It can be very invasive. Second, with social media, images can circulate globally without our knowledge. This could harm others' reputation or safety. We never know who is looking at these pictures and what dangerous things may occur if they are in the wrong hands. Therefore, while taking pictures connects people, it is important for us to ask for permission first.

Task 2
Student Concerts Online

Task 3
Misinformation Effect

Task 4
Nocturnal anthesis

第二套

Task 1
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching sports programs on television is not a good use of time.

Use specific examples and details to support your opinion.

因学点评

这道题讨论的是体育和休闲方式，可以从自身出发选择。

范文：

I don't agree with this argument because to me, watching sports on TV brings me happiness and enriches my life. Most importantly, these games connect me to others. Many large sports events, like the FIFA World Cup or the Olympics, are a common interest of a large number of groups. Families and friends often gather to watch games, creating shared memories and strengthening relationships. Also, sports serve as a stress-reliever. Cheering for a team can boost mood and provide a sense of belonging. It's true that it will be more enjoyable if everyone can watch live games, but that's just not possible. In this case, watching TV sports games serves as a convenient and accessible way for people to enjoy the charm of professional sports.

Task 2
Company-Site Visits

Task 3
Vegetative Propagation

Task 4
How the design of tall buildings has changed over time

第三套

Task 1
Some students choose to enter university immediately after finishing high school. Others prefer to take time off before beginning their university classes. Which option do you think is better? Explain why.

因学点评

这道题是在口语写作中都很喜欢被考官拿出来讨论的gap year的问题，这个选择可以因人而异，根据自己的喜好选择即可。

范文：

Personally, I will choose to take a year off before embarking on university if conditions allow. First, a gap year will allow me to explore interests or careers before committing to a major. For instance, I'm interested in computer science, but I'm not sure  computer programmer is the right career for me. I could use the year interning at a tech startup to figure out if coding or other responsibilities for that job is something I really enjoy. And also, I can try out several other interns and part-time jobs to compare. I think after a year of exploration, I will be able to have a more focused university experience.

Task 2
Final Exam Canceled

Task 3
Conditional Mutualism

Task 4
Neolithic Revolution

3.Listening

对话：

1. 心理学与采访剧作家

2. 停车位问题讨论

3. 针织俱乐部

4. 教授询问是否要提前期末考试并讨论兔子实验

讲座：

1. 地质学，海底火山

2. 艺术史，西非金属艺术

3. 生物学，微生物

4. 建筑学，埃菲尔铁塔

5. 艺术史，a mystery around a famous painting

6. 历史，淘金的历史

4.Reading

1. 动物交流

2. 威尼斯艺术

3. 19世纪美国文学

4. 欧洲壁毯

5. 美索不达米亚

6. 性别二态性

以上就是《3月29日托福考试回顾：考题内容》介绍。外语加油站，专业外语培训服务平台。快速了解雅思、托福、SAT等外语考试报名信息、报考要求、真题详解等，欢迎在线预约咨询。